When the definitive history of the conflict in Syria is written, the
role of the United States in funding, training, and arming rebel groups
will by necessity comprise a major chapter.
Washington’s announcement that
the CIA has cancelled its program to support ‘moderate rebels’ in Syria
– estimated to have cost the US taxpayer over $1billion and which has
helped perpetuate a conflict in which up to 400,000 people have died,
many in the most heinous way – was made recently in the manner of a
multinational corporation wrapping up a failed business venture
overseas.
There was no mention made that the program had been undertaken in
violation of international law. No mention either of the fact it was in
support of an insurgency largely been made up of non-Syrians, who over
the past six years have descended on the country driven not by the
desire to establish a democracy in the country but rather to impose
religious and cultural tyranny.
Patriot of Persia: Muhammad Mossadegh and a Very British Coup by Christopher de Bellaigue – review. This fascinating biography of a 1950s Persian nobleman and politician explains much of Iran's antipathy towards Britain Lindsey Hilsum, The Observer, Sunday 5 February 2012
Iran 1953: 'A Casual Coup with a Few Dollars':
Patriot of Persia:
To rehtink history is to learn and to compare: presently the Western politics, led by Israle and the US as well as their allies, not only revive colonial practices and strategies but increase pressure to bring Iran (now also Syria) to a downfall for easy takeover and exploitation of natural resources. In 1953 the reason was an almost bankrupt Britain who wanted desperately revenues from Iran which the lost after the nationalization of the oil industry by M. Mossadegh. Therefore a terroris was started and instigated and Mossadegh overthrown.
The pattern is almost the same today. For the naive public the WEstern powers speak of democracy, freedom or human rights. In reality the business is maintaining and strengthening the hegemonial frames for their political controll and exploitation.
And, one has to remember, it hasn't started in the fifties but in the beginning of the 20th century, when the country via its resources literally has been "bought" and was kept like under protectorate.
Not many in the West do know the basics in history. The propaganda has ensured a totally distorted view of Iran and the other nations of the Middle East. While the enemies, the islamic nations, are negatively carcatured, Israel's distorted view results in the opposite: the only democracy in the region, an lawful modern state.
Even the Britsh reviews praise the quality of Bellaigue's biography. (At the same time the foster hegemonial politics and wars...)
The example of Mossadegh makes the hatred of many of the moslem world against Great Britain, the US and Isral, if not the whole of Europe, fully understandable.
Acutally, it would be proper time, that these nations pay for their crimes.
One should keep in mind, what Pankaj Mishra writes in his review:
"The story of the Anglo-American destruction of Iran's hopes of establishing a liberal modern state has been told many times, but the cautionary message of 1953 is still far from being absorbed."
"War between Iran and the United States has never seemed more likely than in recent months, as American politicians and journalists dutifully endorse Binyamin Netanyahu's bluster. There is little sign in the mainstream press here or in the US that anyone is paying attention to de Bellaigue and other knowledgable writers on Iran. "
