In 1945, when Bennett Cerf of Random House was preparing to send to the printer An Anthology of Famous English and American Poetry, edited by William Rose Benét
and Conrad Aiken for the Modern Library series, he omitted twelve early
poems by Ezra Pound that Aiken had included in a 1927 anthology on
which the new book had been based. In place of the poems, a note explained
that, over Aiken’s protest, the publishers “flatly refused at this time
to include a single line of Mr. Ezra Pound. This is a statement that
the publishers are not only willing but delighted to print.”
Person over work: the old problem with persons who beame outlaws or who are considered of the enemy's side or marked as traitors, heretics etc.
In the eyes of many writers at the time, Cerf’s refusal to reprint Pound’s poems adopted the same logic that the Nazis had used when burning books by Jews and leftists.
One of Auden's arguments in a letter to Cerf:
Secondly, the issue is far more serious than it appears at first sight;
the relation of an author to his work only one out of many, and once you
accept the idea that one thing to which a man stands related shares in
his guilt, you will presently extend it to others; begin by banning his
poems not because you object to them but because you object to him, and
you will end, as the nazis did, by slaughtering his wife and children.
Today we have a similar ideological warfarc: there are calls to remove books from certain authors from the libraries, to ban their work simply because this or that author was a communist or a fascist or a sexual monster or a plain criminal or whatever. The witch-hunting has become modern again...